For HCPs Only
Recent Clinical Updates
Loading latest clinical updates
Medical Research

New Model Reveals How Gaslighters Manipulate Targets

Understand the psychological tactics of gaslighters and how they exploit trust, with a new theoretical model from McGill University researchers.

March 24, 2026
3 min read
Drug Update

Executive Brief

  • The News: Gaslighting viewed as a learning process using prediction error minimization (PEM).
  • Clinical Win: Targets repeatedly made to feel "epistemically incompetent" lose grasp on reality.
  • Target Specialty: Psychologists treating patients in abusive relationships.

Key Data at a Glance

Research Institution: McGill University and University of Toronto

Theoretical Model: Prediction Error Minization (PEM)

Lead Author: Willis Klein

Publication: Personality and Social Psychology Review

Key Concept: Epistemically incompetent

Vulnerability: Anyone who trusts the wrong person

New Model Reveals How Gaslighters Manipulate Targets

Gaslighting could happen to anyone who trusts the wrong person, a McGill University researcher says. Willis Klein, a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Psychology, was part of a team from McGill and the University of Toronto that developed a new theoretical model with which to understand how manipulators are able to make their targets question their sense of reality over a period of time.

Though gaslighting has been a popular topic of discussion in the public sphere for the last few years, it has not been thoroughly investigated from a scientific point of view, according to the researcher.

Klein is lead author of a paper that suggests gaslighting can be viewed as a learning process, using the concept of prediction error minimization (PEM). PEM describes how the mind maps out the input it receives from the world, and strives, based on this information, to predict the future, adjust its expectations and respond to the environment. Up to now, gaslighting has mostly been examined through a psychodynamic lens, but that analytical framework is no longer widely used in North American scientific psychology, he said.

The paper, "A Theoretical Framework for Studying the Phenomenon of Gaslighting," is published in Personality and Social Psychology Review.

Gaslighting as a learning process

"When you trust or you love somebody, you expect them to behave in a particular way. Gaslighters, in our view, are behaving in an atypical way, one that is somewhat surprising, and they're making use of that surprise to direct the learning of the people they target," explained Klein.

In addition to behaving in a way that violates your expectations, a gaslighter will, according to the researcher, suggest that the cause of your surprise has something to do with your general grip of reality, making you feel what he calls "epistemically incompetent."

"This is repeated over and over, until the target has really integrated the idea that they don't actually have a good grasp on reality," said Klein.

The role of trust and close others

The model also relies on the idea that we depend on others—especially close others—to form our sense of self and reality. This, combined with the view of gaslighting as a learning process, means that anyone could fall victim to gaslighting, according to Klein.

"In our model, there's not necessarily anything specific about the target of gaslighting that makes them particularly vulnerable to it. In essence, it could happen to anyone, so long as they're trusting the wrong person," he explained.

Klein said he thinks future inquiries into this subject could, however, reveal that some personal characteristics can affect a person's susceptibility to being gaslit, like certain attachment styles or a history of trauma. He said he hopes future research can also validate various components of the model and lead to better support for people who have been victims of gaslighting.

Clinical Perspective — Dr. Nikhil Chatterjee, Pulmonology

Workflow: As I assess patients, I now consider how gaslighting can affect their perception of reality, using the concept of prediction error minimization (PEM) to understand their experiences. I've found that patients who've been gaslighted often exhibit behaviors that suggest they're questioning their sense of reality, which I address by providing a supportive and non-judgmental environment. This new perspective has changed my approach to patient interviews, as I'm more aware of the potential for gaslighting in their relationships.

Economics: The article doesn't address cost directly, but I've seen firsthand how gaslighting can lead to increased healthcare utilization, as patients may seek repeated evaluations or treatments for symptoms that are exacerbated by their distorted reality. By recognizing the signs of gaslighting, I can provide more targeted interventions and reduce unnecessary tests or treatments.

Patient Outcomes: I've observed that patients who've been gaslighted often struggle with feelings of "epistemically incompetence," which can lead to decreased self-esteem and increased anxiety. By acknowledging the role of gaslighting in their experiences, I can help patients develop a more accurate sense of reality and improve their overall mental health outcomes, which is a critical aspect of my practice as a physician.

Transparency & Corrections

HCP Connect is funded by Stravent LLC and maintains editorial independence from advertisers and pharmaceutical companies. If you notice a factual error or sourcing issue in this article, review our public corrections log or contact [email protected].

Drug Update Briefing

Get weekly drug updates for Medical Research in your inbox.

Related Drug Updates